The fight to save the Africa Centre London
By
Alex Enahoro
What
began as a unifying, multi-faceted enterprise has become the figurehead in a
divisive battle between Africans in the Diaspora, with intellectual property
pitted against the lure of quick profit, perhaps an age old African fable.
The
Africa Centre in London, UK has been running for the past fifty years in London's artistic shopping district of Covent Garden, has
spurred a campaign amongst the UK's
African community and its supporters, to reverse the decision by its Trustee
members to sell the property without securing an alternative property for the
Africa Centre.
The
Board of trustees is comprised of experienced, highly educated and individuals
respected in the African artistic and business sectors. Members of the board
collectively represent the spirit that created the Africa Centre Trust in 1961,
which secured the said property; a spirit that transcended race, ethnicity,
politics and, initially, finance, between Africans and Europeans in founding a
centre to act as a base for Africans in exile to exhibit their art, and
maintain and build new links within their community, against a mainstream that
often sought to exclude them. This energy was born out at a time when many
African nations such as our own, had just been granted independence and were
seeking to embrace the identity our colonial governments had sought to
eradicate through forced assimilation. The Catholic Church by donating the
Africa Centre its premises symbolized a new vision in African-British
relations.
The
centre quickly became a meeting point for many artists, journalists and
politicians recently exiled from emergent Africa
already in a state of rootless despair. The centre with its intellectual
facilities, also boasted a thriving pan African restaurant and bar, a ritual
feasting place for a growing community with emotional ties to the homeland.
The
Centre became a host to many debates, on issues controversial to our many
nations and often ignored. Feminism, African socialism, press freedom and the
media bias against Africa formed the basis of
successful debates. The Africa Centre acted as the platform for the first black
female publisher, for music bands, for playwrights banned in their own
countries to stage their productions, and in the 1980s, became the hub for the
British involvement in the fight against South Africa's National Party, the
instigators of Apartheid, a system revoked hardly twenty years ago.
It
is also where my father, Peter 'Peter Pan' Enahoro, presented a lecture on 'The
Press in Africa Conference'. Considered a pioneering examination at the time
the seminar it offered my father a vehicle to express many of the concerns and
issues that had alienated and endangered him in our native country. Other
notable Nigerians have been attached to the Africa Centre; Ben Okri has
launched several publications and partaken in several of its debates; legendary
musician Sir Victor Uwaifo played a concert in 1969; Gina Yashere, of Nigerian
parents, presented three rounds of the African and Caribbean cabaret in 1996;
and artist Sokari Douglas-Camp, became the Africa Centre's first artist in
residence in 1987, culminating in an exhibition displayed sculptures
celebrating Nigeria's metal and motor industry.
Just
this past Christmas, the Africa Centre hosted a party for the cast of the
musical Fela, who after staging the production in New York's legendary Broadway
Theatre district, congregated at the Africa Centre after its successful
transfer to London's equally distinguished West End Theatre. On my last trip to
Nigeria over this past
Easter period, I was delighted to note advertising for the production at Lagos's Eko Hotel in Victoria Island.
At the Africa centre, the audiences of these many lectures, exhibitions,
performances and conferences, were not just formed of expatriate Africans, but
also of British nationals keen to explore and share the vision for a committed
interest and celebration of Africa's
development. I had hoped these achievements would herald a new era for
African-European commercial interests.
This
makes the emergence of the 'Save the Africa
Centre' campaign all the more ironic. The need for such a campaign is a
regressive reminder of the obstacles that Africa
often faces in strengthening its self-image. Initially, it had been announced
by the Board of Trustees that the leasehold of the building in Covent Garden would be sold by this December, when
property developers Cap Co would take full possession of the property.
Passionate members of the Africa Centre launched a Save the Africa Centre in
March when knowledge of this became public. Long time supporters of the Africa
Centre naturally became instant signatories, which fell on the deaf ears of the
Board members, many of whom were personally known to them.
The
campaign soon caught the attention of the press, and The Times, a major British
newspaper, published an open letter signed jointly by London's Mayor Boris Johnson, Beninese singer
Youssou N'Dour, and Sudanese economist & mobile communications
entrepreneur, Mo Ibrahim. The legendary South African Anglican cleric and
activist, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, felt so moved he recorded a heartfelt video
message to voice his opposition against the Trustees' decision:
'This
place is no ordinary building site… It has wonderful, important memories to
many of us… You don't think a building can clutch at your heart in a way that
that building has. I do remember when you're feeling a little low and homesick
and everything seemed so foreign… it's more than just a building. In many ways
it embodies the spirit of those who say your continent is not just a catalogue
of disasters. Your continent is a home, and there's a great deal of hope for
it.'
Kenyan
author Ngugi wa Thiongo, who was involved in conferences and lectures at the
African Centre in the late 1970s and early 1980s, reacted incredulously on
learning of the Centre's impending closure during the filming of his own video
message with fellow Kenyan novelist Abdilatif Abdalla. Hailing the centre as a
historic institution, Thiongo equated the significance as a calamity similar to
the possibility of the British Library being shut down.
Having
collected over 1,200 signatories, the Save the Africa Centre Campaign team are
organising a peaceful protest in London,
in response to the leaked announcement that the trustees are speeding up their
sale to this Friday 3rd June. The protest attracted press coverage, and has
influenced the property developers to delay the sale. One suspects, the board
of trustees in a personal bid to eliminate any negative public attention
created out of this campaign, have attempted to shield their reputations from
any tarnish by finalising the sale. Such an act displays naivety and
irresponsibility on the part of the Board members, who are failing in their
commitment to protecting an iconic institution that has spanned generations.
The opportunity for this British based institution to connect directly with the
mother continent is an objective that admittedly needs to be fulfilled, one of
the many goals driving the campaign team and their many followers.
The
campaign team rightfully recognise the need for a public debate between the
Trustees and the Centre's members, many dedicated and industrious individuals
who have publicised, promoted and maintained the running of the Africa Centre
amidst its recent decline. There has been no campaign equalised by the board
members in either fundraising or discussing the survival of the Africa Centre.
The board members themselves have shunned media attention. Upcoming African
events are being undermined without the obvious requirement of a venue to stage
them.
It
is now a timeless story of sides initially united, now defecting to form opposition
and in battle, playing underhand tricks to oppress the 'undesired'. Many of us
on the campaign have speculated that the board members' decision is motivated
primarily by profit, a sad echo of today's African expression of materialism.
It is also a sad reminder to young Africans in the Diaspora such as myself,
that we have made mistakes in neglecting our heritage by not embracing and
promoting the differences that distinguish us until a harsh reminder is
delivered. That our community has let it get to this stage delivers us a share
of responsibility. The opportunity to have used the Centre as a keychain
between the UK
and our countries of origin would close with the Centre itself.
But
the fact that a renewed enthusiasm and devotion to ensure the continuation of
the Centre is being ignored and suppressed by this committee made of a handful
of individuals against a catalogue of notable and longstanding African Centre
members, summarises a failed leadership. The office of the Rwandan High
Commissioner in London revealed that Africa's
diplomatic missions in London,
had discussed this matter as representatives of the African Union, and
expressed their reservations with the board members' abrupt and inconsistent
plans for the Africa Centre.
While
all these expressed desires and hopes of the campaign have so far been met with
opposition and increasing hostility, the renewed energy to preserve this iconic
African heritage has been inspiring to me. My father's pioneering achievements
and those of other notable Africans in Diaspora, are now intertwined with my
generation's continued battle to remain protectors of our heritage, making new
connections and forming new bonds amongst our fellow campaigners, in the spirit
that the originators of the Africa Centre came to found a Centre with a legacy
that touches all us, at home and abroad.
No comments:
Post a Comment