By Kofi Akosah-Sarpong
“If our political parties fail, our democracy will suffer.”
- Michael J.K. Bokor, Ghanaian assistant professor of English at Long Island University , USA
Forget
about the democratic hiccup in Mali ,
once of one of Africa ’s emerging democracies.
Or the fact that Mauritius
is the only African country ranked as being “full” democracy by the Economist
Intelligence Unit’s annual democracy index. Or the Economist Intelligence Unit
also saying the shiny Botswana
democracy is “flawed.”
Democracy
is rapidly breaking out across Africa , albeit
in different tempos. But the real attempts to deepen democracy in Africa are a complicated enterprise. Whether in the main
opposition Sierra Leone People’s Party or Ghana’s ruling National Democratic
Party or Tanzania’s ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi (Revolutionary State Party) or
South Africa’s ruling African National Congress, Africa’s struggles for
democratic deepening is seen not only in the public domain but more seriously
in the internal corners of its vast political parties, where intense democratic
growth is occurring.
This is
what Craig Johnson, of Britain ’s
Overseas Development Institute, describes as moving past the territory of
“procedural democracy” to “substantive” or “deep” democracy. That’s internal
democracies of the political parties become the key drivers of the larger
national democratic processes. In a recent development policy review entitled Local
Democracy, Democratic Decentralization and Rural Development, Craig
Johnson argues that elections are inadequate yet vital part of democratic
system but effective receptive governance depends on three essential variables:
1. how far politicians campaign on substantive issues, 2. the kind of information
voters have at their disposal, and 3. how strong civil society organizations
are.
Whether
in the then ruling Senegalese Democratic Party (PDS) that was defeated by
the Alliance for the Republic, led by
Mackey Sall, who won the 25 March second round presidential election, all of
Craig Johnson’s deep democracy variables are at play in Africa’s democracies as
the internal democracies of Africa’s political parties shape the continent’s
emerging democracy. In the Senegal
case substantive issues and information flow to voters were profoundly at work,
informed by President Abdoulaye Wade giddy changing of the constitution,
adopted in 2001, that sets a limit of two presidential terms, saying it did not
apply to his first mandate as it came into effect after he was first elected.
Wade faced stiff resistance from within his PDS for his attempts to weaken
internal democracy, and in the subsequent struggles paved the way for Sall’s
democratic emergence.
In Sierra Leone ,
President Ernest Koroma revealed the “opposing forces” within his ruling All
Peoples Congress that has aided the party’s governance systems to the renowned
journalist and academic Dr. Lansana Gberie: “In fact let me tell you this. I
have faced the fiercest opposition from within my own party. When I became
leader of the APC [All Peoples Congress party] I almost immediately faced legal
challenges. I was burdened in all with 13 court cases from my colleagues in the
party. Yes, thirteen. Before I entered politics, I had not faced a single court
case. But when I became President, I brought many these people into my
government, and I told them that if you fall, it would be as a result of your
own missteps. I won’t push you out at whim.”
Nowhere
in Africa is the internal “opposing forces” of African political parties more
intense, sometimes bordering on explosion, than Ghana ’s ruling National Democratic
Congress (NDC). Out of the NDC has emerged “recognisable groups,” that are
“stimulating public criticism and debate” on development and democracy issues.
With the founder of NDC, ex-President jerry Rawlings, breathing heavily on the
presidency of John Atta Mills, internal criticisms within the NDC has seen
groups emerging that have been taking aims at the performance of the party.
Against tradition, the former First Lady Mrs. Nana Konadu Agyeman-Rawlings
contested for the NDC flagbearership slot against the incumbent President John
Atta Mills. Mrs. Rawlings, saying the NDC’s internal structures is impotent;
she lost the contest and later accused President Mills of rigging the
elections.
Craig
Johnson says these intra-party activities will “articulated interest and
stimulated debate in no small way on the internal dynamics and debate that
exist within political parties.”
Whether
in Ghana ’s NDC or Tanzania ’s
Chama Cha Mapinduzi, the view is that African political parties can address
basic development issues, through the emerging decentralization programmes,
with deep democracy ideals. In Ghana ,
the 24-year-old decentralization programme, as means of tackling rural poverty
and bringing Ghanaians into the development process, is still entangled with
the central government. Traditional institutions, as the core values of
Ghanaians, have still not been integrated into the decentralization programme
fully.
Characteristic
of other African democracies, the idea in Ghana is that “all by-laws are
approved by the Minister of Local Government and Rural Development … The
President has the power to dissolve defaulting or non-performing DAs without
consulting the electorate …The Minister of Local Government and Rural
Development has power to issue guidelines, in respect of fees to be charged by
the DAs for the service and facilities provided, licenses and permits issued or
rates levied by DAs” make local voices minimal in the very affairs that are to
affect their welfare. This is not “entirely democratic in character,” as Craig
Johnson explains, “reiterating the tension that often exists between coherent
policy and popular democracy.”
As Africa ’s democracy scrimmages to deepen, the struggle
between its civil society and the African state is on bumpy moves. While
democratic norms have opened up the civil society, Africa
is yet to experience “strong and vibrant civil society,” especially in
organizing to demand better government, issues, policies, and programmes. Helge
Ronning, a professor of media and communications at the University of Oslo,
Norway, argues that the tussle between African “civil society organisations and
the state often take the form of an attempt by the state to overpower non-governmental
organisations (NGOs) by bringing them under government control.”
This is
“linked to a fear by government of the potential NGOs have for organising people
outside the state structures.” This isn’t healthy for deepening democratization
in Africa , yet like the campaigns for freedom
from colonial rule some 50 years ago there is no other way than for Africans to
campaign for robust and energetic civil society as part of deepening their democracy.
Primarily, with the African political parties on the vanguard, Craig Johnson
argues that “the development of a strong and vibrant civil society is also
inextricably linked to the political opportunities the state makes available,
and the ways in which poor and marginal groups in society exploit these
opportunities.”
History
isn’t on the good side of Africa ’s democracy.
From the dark experiences of autocratic one-party systems to authoritarian
military juntas, Africa ’s political parties
have to work really hard to deepen
democracy. Mali’s coup d’état, the sham democracy in the Central African
Republic, and the on-again, off-again violent political drama in Guinea Bissau
shows that there is yet to be real “transitions
from authoritarianism” to real democracy
brewed in African sensibilities. Crucial to real
African democracy is what Craig Johnson calls ““delegitimisation” of the
mindset of “authoritarian regimes” of yesteryears.
With Zimbabwe , Angola ,
Chad and others still mired
in authoritarian regimes but masking as democracies, Africa ’s
different democratic capabilities indicate that real or full democracy in
the continent is a “very slow process.” This supports the argument that
introducing democratic institutions do not automatically lead to democratic
politics. No doubt, Elizabeth Ohene, the veteran Ghanaian journalist, has
observed that “It has been my misfortune to have lived long enough to see so
many people who were fighting for democracy, attain power and turn out to be
like the tyrants they fought to overthrow.”
For Africa ’s development, the understandable challenge, as Craig
Johnson suggests, is “encouraging or laying
the foundations for democratic
development in the short- to medium-term.” You cannot encourage democratic
development when in places like oil-rich but poverty-ridden Equatorial Guinea , as the London , UK-based Economist reported, “President Teodoro Obiang was “elected” with
95% of the vote. His party “won” 99% of seats in parliament.”
Fundamentally,
the Equatorial Guinea experience
reveals that Africa ’s political parties are
still weak in the face of overwhelming autocrats. The Gambia ’s Yahya
Jammeh and the country’s opposition parties is a case in point. With such
experiences, African political parties have to help in the distribution of
information, especially on development issues, policies and programmes, that
relate to government performance.
Beyond
the more popular calls by such international institutions like the World Bank
for good governance and transparency in Africa ,
Craig Johnson offers that “activities of this nature would entail the
development of networks and media that are not exclusively dependent upon the
achievement of basic literacy. One obvious example is the electronic media,”
where “local news, talk shows, and question-and-answer programs are all
excellent ways to spread political news
widely … radio, especially the AM band, is cheap to operate, does not require
line-of-sight transmission like TV, and has great audience potential.”
Whether
in Senegal , Nigeria , Mauritius
or Cape Verde ,
another key source of empowering Africans in their democratic evolution by African
political parties is interactive communication technology. Craig Johnson suggests that “the development
of accessible and inexpensive forms of telecommunications (e.g. landline
telephones, satellite networks, fibre optic systems) can facilitate the
transmission of politically and economically relevant information.”
Driven
mass communication tools, Africa’s fights for democratic deepening
fundamentally rest with its political parties which activities are expected to
augment Africa ’s shaky
civil societies in the overall democratic development of the continent. And so,
as Michael J.K. Bokor, assistant professor of English at Long Island University , USA ,
commented, if African political parties fail, African democracy will suffer.
Kofi Akosah-Sarpong wrote in from Ottawa, Canada
No comments:
Post a Comment