Putin's Next Move Could Make Eastern Europe Explode
By By Brett LoGiurato (Reuters)
What is going on in Vladimir Putin's mind?That's the question a panel of Russia experts was trying to answer Tuesday morning. Attention on Russia and the crisis in Ukraine has dwindled as the press has focused more on the West's fight against the extremist group calling itself the Islamic State.
US Secretary of State John
Kerry also announced Tuesday increased intelligence-gathering
cooperation with Russia on the group — also known as ISIS — a
particularly significant development given the recent thaw in US-Russia
relations.
But this panel, which was
moderated by Reuters, took a much more alarmist tone when speaking
about America's relations with Moscow and speculating about Putin. All
the experts in attendance warned that Putin's recent moves in Ukraine
might only be the start of new territorial ambitions.
Three of the four panelists —
New Yorker editor David Remnick, journalist and author Masha Gessen,
Russian political activist and former grand chessmaster Garry Kasparov,
and former Treasury Department official Roger Altman — agreed Putin
could soon try to stretch his influence into the Baltic states of
Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.
"They already are under pressure," Gessen, the author of a 2012 unauthorized biography
of Putin, said of the Baltics. "That's very much where he's doing his
nuclear saber-rattling, and that's where he's planning to call NATO's
bluff."
Unlike Ukraine, all three
Baltic states are NATO members. NATO's Article 5 requires all members
of the alliance come to the defense of any member that is attacked or
targeted.
Putin last month made casual mention of his country's nuclear arsenal, around the same time NATO accused Russian forces of an "incursion" in Ukraine.
Many analysts have speculated Putin's next move could come in the
Baltic states, something that would be a clear challenge to NATO.
Amid the bluster from Putin — who also reportedly said in a private conversation
he could invade Poland, Romania, and the Baltic states if he really
wanted to — NATO states made a point of countering with strong rhetoric
of their own.
President Barack Obama traveled to Estonia last month on
the way to a meeting in Wales with other NATO states, in a trip the
White House said was aimed at reassuring NATO allies in the Baltics that
felt threatened by Putin's moves in Ukraine. The message, a White House adviser said, was for Putin to "not even think about messing around" with the region.
But members of the panel
were skeptical the US and other European members would rush to the
Baltics' defense if they were targeted. And they said Putin would love a
chance to try to embarrass NATO and paint it as nothing more than a
symbolic alliance.
Kasparov speculated Putin may
try to push NATO by employing some of the same tactics he used in
Crimea, which Russia formally annexed from Ukraine in March. He said
that, rather than marching across the border, Russia would try to stir
up some pro-Moscow "form of dissent" in the Baltics. This would allow
Russia to maintain plausible deniability and characterize any military
action in the region as a reaction — something that would make it
difficult for NATO members to call it an invasion.
Remnick agreed a potential
Putin playbook for the Baltics would resemble Crimea. He added that a
potential Putin push into the region wouldn't resemble "Czechoslovakia
in 1968," when the Soviet Union lined up tanks and invaded the country
to crack down on reformist trends.
"There's a rich tradition of
these highly crude, sophisticated provocations," Remnick said. "It's not
going to look like Czechoslovakia in 1968. Thousands of tanks are not
going to cross into [the Baltics]. The operation in Crimea, on a
military intelligence basis, was brilliant. Brilliant."
What may be most disconcerting
about Putin in general, however, is his lack of predictability. All of
the panelists agreed on one thing: Putin's end goal is to stay in power.
And if that goal is suddenly best furthered through making noise in the
Baltics, then there's a very real possibility he'll take action.
"We're talking about a man who
doesn't have a plan. So we're trying to figure out what his plan is, but
he doesn't have one," Gessen said. "He sees that as an option. It is
definitely an option, he is considering it, and he may wake up one
morning and do it."SOURCE
No comments:
Post a Comment